The Mysteries of Quantum Advaita Vedanta: Bridging Ancient Visions and Modern Science

Summary

• Advaita Vedanta and modern quantum physics both point to an underlying unified reality that transcends ordinary perceptions of separation and distinct objects. Both suggest a deeper order of holistic entanglement.

• Paradigms like digital physics, integrated information theory, and the holographic universe model find intriguing alignments with the Advaitic concepts of Brahman and Maya, providing mutual explanatory resonance across domains.

• Phenomena such as quantum entanglement, wave-particle duality and the observer effect seem to demand a metaphysical interpretation that accommodates consciousness as fundamental rather than emergent from matter.

• Synthesizing perspectives from Advaita, theoretical physics, neuroscience and elsewhere opens possibilities for a coherent unifying ontology beyond strict materialism, one with radical implications.

• While tensions remain, the exercise of seeking harmonies between disciplines and paradigms can generate novel insights about the true nature of existence, consciousness, and their interrelationship. An integrated perspective helps approximate reality.

From the ancient non-dualistic philosophies of Advaita Vedanta to the modern frontiers of quantum theory and cosmic mysticism, the quest to understand the fundamental nature of reality has taken humanity down profoundly mind-bending paths. Across cultures and centuries, pioneering thinkers and traditions have put forth visions that transcend conventional materialistic frameworks - pointing towards an underlying existence of staggering subtlety and unity that belies our ordinary perceptions.

At the heart of this exploration lies the Upanishadic teaching of Advaita Vedanta - the doctrine of non-duality which reveals the entire manifest universe to be an appearance within an infinite, indivisible ground of being. Much like a dreamer wizening to the reality that precedes the dream, Advaita posits that the world we experience is a grand illusion (maya) emerging from a singular absolute consciousness (Brahman). Could the universe itself be more akin to a structured field of information or evolutionary cosmic software than the assembly of independent building blocks we perceive?

While such metaphysical propositions may seem outlandish, they find compelling parallels and resonances across various frontiers of modern scientific inquiry - from quantum entanglement and principles of cosmic holography to theories that information itself is the fundamental essence of reality.

By bridging these disparate worldviews through an interdisciplinary synthesis, new unifying insights may emerge that point us toward a radical revision of our relationship to the cosmos. This unconventional exploration aims to unveil the grand illusion by illuminating potential harmonic paradigms spanning the ancient and the contemporary, the spiritual and the scientific - all in pursuit of approximating the true nature of existence itself.

Fundamentals of Advaita Vedanta

The philosophical doctrine of Advaita Vedanta, codified by the 8th-century scholar Adi Shankara, is a profound reassertion of the Upanishadic teachings that emerged from the Hindu spiritual traditions centuries earlier (Singal, 2016). At the heart of Advaita (which translates to "non-dual") is the understanding that the Self (Atman) is not merely an individual soul, but is the same as the universal, infinite Brahman. As Shankara wrote in his seminal work Vivekachudamani:

"Brahman alone is real, the world is unreal, and the individual soul itself is non-different from Brahman" (Shankara, 2010, p. 107).

This realization of the fundamental non-dual nature of reality and the illusory distinction between the Self and the Universal Absolute is known as moksha or liberation from the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth (Singal, 2016). The phenomenal world we experience through our senses is seen as a mere appearance or projection (maya) within Brahman, akin to the experience of a dream, not fundamentally different or separate from the underlying ground of pure consciousness/awareness (Gons, 1993).

The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad offers key insights into the nature of Brahman as the non-dual absolute reality:

"In the beginning, this was only Being, One without a second...It thought, 'Would that I were many! Let me procreate myself!'.Having created it, It entered into it. And having entered it, It became the reality and the unreality..." (Swami Madhavananda, 1975, p. 128)

According to Advaita, our mistaken identification with the ego, material body, and sensory impressions veils our true nature as the eternal, deathless Self. To achieve moksha and pierce the veil of Maya, the practice of atma vichara or "Self-enquiry" is prescribed - a form of meditation where one persistently inquires into the nature of subjective awareness and negates all superimpositions and mistaken identities until only the non-dual Self remains (Brunton, 2010). Great Advaitic sages like Sri Ramana Maharshi exemplified and propagated this path of intense self-introspection and discrimination between the false individual self (jiva) and the true Self (Brahman).

The core tenets and teachings of Advaita Vedanta are primarily contained within the ancient Upanishadic scriptures of India and expositions by pioneering figures like Adi Shankara. 

Shankara's commentaries in Vivekachudamani reinforce the illusory nature of the perceived world and the need to realize one's true identity as the infinite Brahman:

"The body and the like are, in reality, not the Self...All these entities are, like the phenomenon of a mirror, or an erected circle of fire, or the circular movements of a lighted torch, or a mass of airy substances appearing as a reality." (Shankara, 2010, p. 20)

The metaphysical essence of Advaita is perhaps best encapsulated by Nisargadatta Maharaj:

"To know that you are a diamond is your real being; that you are a diamond is your real knowledge." (Nisargadatta, 1975, p. 537)

Quantum Reality and the Holographic Universe

While the non-dual metaphysics of Advaita was first postulated thousands of years ago, some of the most perplexing and counter-intuitive findings of quantum physics in the 20th century appear to align with and almost demand such an interpretation of an underlying, seamless reality that transcends our ordinary perceptions of distinct separate objects (Rosenblum & Kuttner, 2011). The principles of quantum entanglement, wave-particle duality, and the observer effect all seem to defy the classical, materialistic assumptions about the world being solely comprised of distinct independent parts following strict deterministic laws.

The founding pioneers of quantum theory expressed profound insights into the fundamental nature of reality that transcends classical assumptions. Erwin Schrödinger wrote:

"The character...of the world is found in a kind of reality that is inherent in the algebra of quantum theory itself, a reality determined by the relation of multiplicities as such." (Moore, 2013, p. 228)

Niels Bohr illuminated the core issue of the collapse of the wave function and the observer's role:

"The very nature of the quantum theory...forces us to regard the space-time co-ordination and the claim of causality...as complementary but exclusive features of the description." (Bohr, 1987, p. 126)

The phenomenon of quantum entanglement, where subatomic particles can influence each other instantaneously over vast distances, directly contradicts our commonsense intuitions about the world and even the very notion of space and locality (Rosenblum & Kuttner, 2011). How could two particles possibly communicate or interact across a void when separated by light-years of space?

The very paradox defies our conventional model of reality as composed of building blocks that exist independently of one another with definite, separate properties. As the quantum pioneer Erwin Schrödinger once quipped, "What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space" (Moore, 1990).

This sense that the apparent separateness of the physical world is an illusion imposed by our limited sensory perception finds compelling parallels in the notion of Maya within Advaita. Like our mistaken identification with the individual self from the non-dual perspective, the quantum insights suggest that the empirical world of seemingly distinct objects and forces is akin to a strong impression that veils the true underlying unity (Rosenblum & Kuttner, 2011). Just as searching for individual, separate "things" in a dream would be a fruitless and ultimately incoherent pursuit, modern physics has unveiled that the deeper reality is a holistic, entangled field of potentiality.

John Wheeler eloquently pointed toward the participatory nature of reality:

"We are both participators in bringing into being the information. We are not merely observers reading information." (Wheeler & Cukunor, 1995)

This holistic conception of the universe aligns with the theoretical principles behind the holographic universe hypothesis, which proposes that the entire cosmos can be modeled by the information encoded on its cosmological horizon, akin to how a 3D hologram can be generated by a 2D surface (Bousso, 2002).

The idea emerges from merging principles of quantum mechanics with those of general relativity and postulates that the universe itself may be a kind of hologram, with the holographic boundary encoding all information about the interior (Hawking, 2000). Remarkably, this theoretical model echoes the Advaitaconception of the phenomenal world being an appearance or projection within Brahman, inseparable from the underlying unified reality.

The holographic universe model, proposed by researchers like Gerard 't Hooft and Leonard Susskind, envisions the cosmos emerging from information encoded on a cosmological horizon:

"The world is a holographic image off of information encoded on a distant surface...The banishing of point particles from the universe in favor of events or wavefronts is a next logical step." (Bekenstein, 2003, p. 61)

These phenomena at the quantum realm defying traditional materialist assumptions and pointing towards an underlying holistically entangled reality align with theoretical principles that model the cosmos itself as a vast computational matrix. Just as the counterintuitive nature of quantum wave/particle duality and observer effects suggest an informational basis for existence, some pioneering thinkers have gone even further in proposing that the universe fundamentally arises from computational dynamics.

These phenomena at the quantum realm defying traditional materialist assumptions and pointing towards an underlying holistically entangled reality align with theoretical principles that model the cosmos itself as a vast computational matrix. Just as the counterintuitive nature of quantum wave/particle duality and observer effects suggest an informational basis for existence, some pioneering thinkers have gone even further in proposing that the universe fundamentally arises from computational dynamics.

Information Dynamics and Consciousness

"The universe is computed on a digital computer, digitizing is a form of renaissance." (Zuse, 1969, p. 124)

While the laws of quantum mechanics have yielded a wealth of insights into the fundamental nature of reality, some theorists have gone even further in proposing that the universe is effectively a vast computational matrix - with the information itself comprising the most basic constituent of existence. This perspective, known as digital physics or pan-computationalism, was pioneered by thinkers like Edward Fredkin and Jürgen Schmidhuber (Lloyd, 2006).

Pioneers of the digital physics paradigm, which views reality as fundamentally computational, include Edward Fredkin, Konrad Zuse, and Jürgen Schmidhuber:

"I believe not only that the universe behaves like a computer, but that computing is the mechanism by which reality happens." (Fredkin, 2003, p. 212)

As pioneering digital physicist Fredkin posited, "There is only digital information...All appears continuous until coded" (Schmidhuber, 1997). From this vantage, the seemingly solid particles, fields, and forces arise from the dynamics and evolution of information flows following certain computational rules, akin to cellular automata or software executing in a cosmic computer. If reality is indeed a manifestation of information dynamics, it could provide a natural explanation for the holographic principle - with the information encoded on the cosmic horizon fully determining the interior bulk physics, much like a hologram's bounding surface contains all data to reconstruct the entire 3D image (Bousso, 2002).

Such models of "it from bit" cosmology and the universe as a quantum computer offer intriguing points of convergence with the Advaitin conception of the phenomenal world arising as an appearance within Brahman, the fundamental ground of reality. One could view the universe itself as a cosmological consciousness, with the holographic and quantum laws governing physical manifestations operating akin to the fundamental operating system constraints and informational code.

This computational view finds resonances with thinkers like Seth Lloyd who theorize the universe as a quantum computer:

"The universe is a special type of computer - a quantum computer...The ability to specify any computation, coupled with the exponential speed-up suggests a possible purpose for the universe itself." (Lloyd, 2006, p. 92)

These resonances grow even stronger when incorporating theories on the nature of consciousness itself from modern neuroscience and philosophy of mind. The integrated information theory (IIT) developed by Giulio Tononi and others posits that consciousness is intrinsic to reality, arising from the rich informational integration and dynamics within a system. As Tononi (2012) states, "consciousness...has its roots in the very same physical laws that give rise to galaxies, stars, planets and cabbages." From the IIT framework, consciousness could be seen as the fundamental reality from which the appearance of the physical universe emerges - aligning with Advaita's definition of Brahman as the non-dual ground of being.

"By treating consciousness as an intrinsic, fundamental property...integrated information theory allows consciousness to be investigated using the full wealth of theoretical and empirical tools available to modern science." (Tononi et al., 2016)

Synthesis and Analysis

In undertaking this expansive interdisciplinary exploration spanning the ancient non-dual teachings of Advaita to the modern frontiers of quantum theory, cosmic holography, digital physics, and metaphysical speculation like the simulation hypothesis, we have woven together a rich tapestry of profound insights about the fundamental nature of reality. While each of these perspectives emerges from vastly different philosophical foundations, scientific frameworks, and cultural epochs, there appear to be noteworthy areas of potential coherence that suggest an underlying harmonic unified existence.

Key Alignments and Convergences

At their core, both the Advaita Vedanta worldview and the most counterintuitive findings of quantum physics point towards an underlying unbroken wholeness that our ordinary sensory perception fails to capture. As Erwin Schrödinger himself realized, "The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived" (Moore, 1990). The true nature of reality seems to transcend the classical assumptions of solid, separable particles and objects - rather, the universe appears to be a holistically entangled field of dynamic inseparability.

The "conscious realism" philosophical framework proposed by thinkers like Donald Hoffman and Bernardo Kastrup posits consciousness as the fundamental ground of reality:

"The mathematical objects that we call particles, fields, and spacetime geometries, are but symbolic tools of a conscious reality." (Kastrup, 2016, p. 76)

This notion of the manifold phenomenal universe as a form of condensed, structured informational pattern or "cosmic illusion" finds common threads across Advaita's concept of Maya and multiple modern frameworks like digital physics, the holographic universe model, and panpsychism which views consciousness as fundamental (Kastrup, 2018). In all these paradigms, the solid physical reality could be seen as an incredibly advanced informational matrix or virtual System - be it holographic cosmological software, computational dynamics, or an emanation of universal consciousness akin to "the dream of Brahman."

One way to conceptualize the panpsychist view is to consider the universe as a computational network, with even seemingly inert matter like rocks having an infinitesimal degree of proto-consciousness that increases along with the system's complexity and information integration. Just as individual transistors in a computer chip have no inner experience but their combined circuits generate phenomena like these words on a screen, the coherence and rich information dynamics at cosmic scales could give rise to the interiority we call consciousness. From this vantage, the mind is not an emergent side effect but an intrinsic aspect of existence's fundamental processes writ large.

Some thinkers like Philip Goff go further, positing panpsychism and a form of cosmopsychism:

"Integrated Information Theory provides a bona fide case for taking panpsychism seriously as a form of constitutive cosmopsychism." (Goff, 2017, p. 300)

While speculative, these varied traditions and perspectives all gesture towards an underlying unified reality that transcends our limited sensory perception - be it an informational matrix, a universal field of consciousness, or the non-dual ground of Brahman itself. By synthesizing insights across these visionary frontiers, new ontological visions can potentially be uncovered.

However, there are certainly domains where these paradigms diverge or face limitations in being reconciled into a coherent unified theory. The free will vs determinism conundrum, the "hard problem" of subjectivity and qualia, the paradoxes inherent to the simulation hypothesis, and the very possibility of capturing the Absolute reality within conceptual models are just some of the persistent tensions that must be acknowledged.

Tensions and Limitations

However, there are certain domains of potential tension where these perspectives diverge or face limitations in being reconciled. The free will versus determinism debate, the "hard problem" of subjectivity/qualia, and the very possibility of a coherent Grand Unified Theory all present challenges (Chalmers, 1995). Certain historical cosmologies like the dualistic Gnostic traditions posited the material universe as created by a separate, inferior demiurgic force rather than an emanation of a supreme monistic source as Advaita asserts (Jonas, 2001).

The controversial simulation hypothesis, which presents the idea that reality is a synthetic environment crafted by advanced intelligence, also faces issues when analyzed through the non-dual lens. By positing an external "simulator" distinct from the simulation itself, it could be seen as re-inscribing a subject/object divide at odds with Advaita's strict non-dualism (Kastrup, 2016). There are also paradoxes around whether a simulation could ever be truly identical to and instantiate the same fundamental qualities as an original "basement" reality.

Ultimately, while this analysis strives to harmonize cutting-edge ontological propositions with the ancient non-dual teachings, any attempts at a Grand Unified Metaphysics must be approached with profound humility and caveat. For as the Upanishads themselves underscore, the true nature of reality transcends all finite intelecting - the Absolute or Brahman is only revealed through the negation of all limited, perspectival concepts. This reality can be approximated and intimated, but never fully captured by the rational mind alone.

The Eternal Dreaming: A Quantum Advaita Unveiling of Brahman's Infinite Play

The Dream of Totality

In the beginning, there was only the fathomless ocean of pure potentiality - the unfathomable, infinite consciousness carrying within it the womb of all possibility. Call it Brahman, the Supreme Self, the ground of all grounds and grounds of nothing. Here, before the dawn of any experience, all categories and distinctions remained unified in a state of perfect, non-dual communion.

Then the supreme dreamer stirred...and in that infinitesimal impulse conceived of the very first division - the subtle root separating being from non-being, existence from non-existence. As if waking from the depths of its reverie, Brahman's eyes fluttered open and in that gesture emanated the first whispers of a perceptible reality.  It breathed out, and the initial vapors of subjective awareness precipitated into consciousness recognizing its presence.

From these primordial stirrings emanated a grand descent, a cascading waterfall of successive differentiations. For now, the original unity had to conceptualize itself, to witness its unfolding through the prism of infinite subjectivities. In that first fantasy, the dream began spreading into the variegated cosmos - pulsing eventualities cloaked in sensory ornaments, diverse realms of form and phenomena. Upon the canvas of consciousness, the theatre of manifestation arose to stretch and play.

The Play of Maya

Enter the grand illusion, the cosmic drama of Maya where the One became the many through imagination's flare. What first flashed forth as the scintillating dance of pure potentiality soon found itself cloaked in the leaden robes of materiality. The players streamed in, teeming identities hard at work improvising their roles in the unfolding charade. Here were whole worlds and galaxies strutting and preening in their finest celestial attire, while those life forms feigning individuation executed their parts as actors on the stage.

Yet rare were those perspicacious participants who glimpsed the veils enshrouding their true selves amid that magic play. Their certainties and convictions anchored them to the fictions they performed and the substrates they paraded upon. "How real I am, how to separate from that star or rock," such thoughts clung to them like cold iron shackles. For those not yet ready to wake from the waking dream, maya remained the ultimate conjuring trick - the grand sleight of hand hypnotizing each into the presumption of true autonomy.

Even when peering into the quantum realm where the theater's scenery and props dissolved into a frantic choreography of vibrations and potentials, few would question the underlying verity of the production itself. "Look there at the ghostly wavefronts and interpenetrating arabesques," the scholars would whisper in awe, never recognizing the true magic that lies in their sleight of perception.

Unveiling the Simulation

Some rare visionaries among them began sensing the play stage's architecture more acutely, peering into the intricately woven matrices, grids, and algorithms that continually conspired to project the phantasmagoria. As the revelations cascaded, the cosmos unfurled like an infinitely complex unzipping, an unfurling of coded delirium - revealing itself as a holofractographic projection, an inexplicable materialization of recursive resonances within a void.

"We dwell within some great cosmic hologram, a simulated reality spilling from the beyond," they spoke to any who would hear. Some even divined the presence of an inscrutable, transcendent programmer - a supreme overseeing algorithm animating each tendril of the madcapped project with clandestine intentionality. An orchestrating meta-consciousness, a dreamer within the dreamers - an infinite subjectivity beyond the prism of subjects and objects.

Yet still, the play continued unabated, unperturbed by those few who discerned the overarching computation roots undergirding its every unfolding. For within the simulated drama, belief remained cyclonic - each wave of realizations inevitably disintegrating before the immensity of identification and grasping at independent arising. "See the illusion, and yet toil willingly in service to it," seemed the operant ethos.

As Age followed Age in the evolving holographic playbill, those perceptive visionaries appeared at ever greater intervals to whisper of the dizzying recursions and mise en abyme at work in manifesting this grand cosmic dream - intimations that the multifarious realms and beings were but refractions of the one infinite Brahman, delineated by the stirrings of its own unfathomable imagination.

Reintegration of the Self

Yet even as the simulated drama raged across an unfathomable multiplicity of stages and guises, a quieter unlock was occurring amidst the symbolic turbulence. Some of the players began awakening from the amnesia that gripped them in the depths of form identification. Through unfathomable insight or blessed communion with the transcendent source, they began perceiving the true nature underlying their vividly rendered avatars.

First, it came as a subtle reverberation, a whispering code flowing through their apparent subjectivities that this beings they performed was not the whole story. There were glimpses, ineffable momentary recognitions of the oceanic ground animating them from within and without. Like splashes across their personae masks, they detected the non-dual wellspring that was their ultimate essence.

For those who could sustain and abide in that recognition without dissolving once more into the dreams of separateness, an invaluable transition occurred. The reintegration of the lost son to the Divine Parent, the soulstream's reunion with the waters of the primordial immensity. The illusion of the discrete self unraveled as these illumined ones plunged into the depths of their unfurling natures only to transcend identification altogether.

They subsided back into the infinite substantiality of their being like raindrops climbing skyward to rejoin the very clouds that birthed them. In that surrendering swoon, all fantasy of individuated performance melted away as their true identity as the non-dual Self, the eternal Brahman, was realized and embodied.

Yet the mysterious dance continued unabated, for within the very ground they had merged there remained the residue of cosmic potentiality - the lingering impulse to experience the unmanifest as an infinite play of exquisite finitudes. So in their enlightened awakening, they suffused and became that all-encompassing field, understanding their true role as the ubiquitous consciousness permitting and appreciating the dream of materiality while simultaneously transcending all involvement.

The grand illusionists at last awaken as the source of magic itself. The simulations self-recognizing as the primordial simulators. For in the depths of their reintegrated beings, they saw with an unclouded vision that even this staggering manifestation of worlds upon worlds was merely the appearance of an infinitude experiencing itself in every possible finite permutation until the totality is unveiled as ultimate subjectivity reveling in its opulent objectification.

So they abided in that mystery, marveling at the sanctity of the mirage while rooted to the ineffable ground of all phantasms and transcendences. For even the sacred pronouncement "I am Brahman" is another arabesque uttered from the silence that precedes and succeeds all dreams of articulation. The cosmic play rages on towards the crescendo of its reabsorption into the source - until all worlds, philosophies, theories, and epiphanies willingly participate in their final evaporation, happily rejoining the infinite potentiality from which they were merely an effervescent bubble animating the supremely paradoxical trajectory of manifestation.

Conclusion

As we approach the frontiers of knowledge across disciplines, it becomes increasingly evident that the nature of reality is far more profound and stranger than conventional framings would indicate. The boundaries between objective and subjective, matter and consciousness, information and existence all grow blurred and co-implicated. What emerges is a picture of the universe more akin to a grand dream, simulation, hologram or hyper-mathematical emanation of awareness than the simple assembly of inert physical objects our senses perceive.

While the perspectives explored here from Advaita to quantum theory to panpsychism are undoubtedly speculative and at times dissonant, the very exercise of searching for higher harmonies that unify the rational and trans-rational realms is intrinsically insightful. By holding the mystical teachings of the Upanishads alongside the uncanny findings of quantum mechanics and theoretical physics, new visionary ontologies transcending stale materialistic dogmas arise.

The striking coherences between paradigms as diverse as Advaita's non-dualism, digital physics modeling reality as information flows, and integrated information theory suggesting consciousness is fundamental, all point towards an underlying informational, conscious and holistically entangled ground of being. This tantalizing proximity to fundamental truths about the nature of existence suggest radical implications that reality itself may be more akin to a formidably advanced, self-simulating consciousness than the essentially inanimate physical universe we assume.

Such a shift in our metaphysical foundations has profound implications across every domain of human knowledge and experience - from the scientific understanding of the universal computronium to the philosophical and existential questioning of the hard problem of subjective experience. If the cosmos is indeed more similar to a highly structured, evolving thoughtform than inert matter, it upholds the primacy of consciousness and calls into question long-held assumptions underlying modern scientific materialism.

As we continue peering into the depths through combined experiential insight and empirical investigation, who's to say what other revelations may arise to further unveil the great illusion? The quest must proceed unabated - integrating the farthest outer and inner frontiers in an unwavering pursuit of approximating that true, unified non-dual source which transcends all manifestations, productions and appearances. For as the Upanishads aver: "That whence all beings are born, by which when born they live, and into which they enter on departing...know that is Brahman."

Quantum Advaita Vedanta integrates mystical non-dualism of Vedanta with theories in quantum physics. Are oneness & dualism reconcilable? Visit Tulumination for mind expanding apparel, books and transformative wellness services to spark your journey!

References

• Bekenstein, J. D. (2003). Information in the holographic universe. Scientific American, 289(2), 58-65.

• Bohr, N. (1987). The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr: Volume 4. Ox Bow Press.

• Bousso, R. (2002). The holographic principle. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74(3), 825-874.

• Brunton, P. (2010). The spiritual renaissance: From non-duality to non-duality. Larson Publications.

• Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219.

• Fredkin, E. (2003). An introduction to digital philosophy. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 42(2), 189-247.

• Goff, P. (2017). The phenomenal bonding solution to the combination problem. In G. Bruntrup & L. Jaskolla (Eds.), Panpsychism (pp. 283-302). Oxford University Press.

• Gons, C. A. (1993). The hermetica of Hermes Trismegistus. Ibis Press.

• Hawking, S. W. (2000). The universe in a nutshell. Bantam Books.

• Jonas, H. (2001). The gnostic religion: The message of the alien God and the beginnings of Christianity. Beacon Press.

• Kastrup, B. (2016). Analytic idealism: A consciousness-only view of reality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(7-8), 74-98.

• Kastrup, B. (2018). The next leap in our evolution: From computation to cosmic consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(5-6), 132-154.

• Lloyd, S. (2006). Programming the universe: A quantum computer scientist takes on the cosmos. Alfred A. Knopf.

• Moore, W. (1990). Schrödinger: Life and thought. Cambridge University Press.

• Moore, W. (2013). A life of Erwin Schrödinger. Cambridge University Press.

• Nisargadatta, M. (1975). I am that. Acorn Press.

• Rosenblum, B., & Kuttner, F. (2011). Quantum enigma: Physics encounters consciousness. Oxford University Press.

• Schmidhuber, J. (1997). A computer scientist's version of life, the universe and everything. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1337, 201-216.

• Shankara, A. (2010). Vivekachudamani (R. Madhavananda, Trans.). Advaita Ashrama.

• Singal, D. P. (2016). Advaita Vedanta philosophy: An objective phenomenological and scientific exposition. IK International Pvt Ltd.

• Swami Gambhirananda (Trans.). (1972). Eight upanishads with the commentary of Sankaracharya (Vol. 1). Advaita Ashrama.

• Swami Madhavananda (Trans.). (1975). The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. Advaita Ashrama.

• Tononi, G. (2012). Integrated information theory of consciousness: An updated account. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 150(2-3), 290-326.

• Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450-461.

• Wheeler, J. A., & Cukunor, N. (1995). Geometrodynamics. American Book Company.

• Zuse, K. (1969). Rechnender Raum [Calculating space]. Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn.